employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Royal Australian Navy

Engaged Employer

Royal Australian Navy reviews

3.4

49% would recommend to a friend

(207 total reviews)

Vice Admiral Mark Hammond

70% approve of CEO

41% positive business outlook

Royal Australian Navy has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 207 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Royal Australian Navy employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Aerospace and defence industry (3.6 stars).

Reviews by job title

207 reviews
1.0
Nov 7, 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Salary for personnel that stick with it, without any qualifications and a pass in Year 10 is great. Sometimes you may travel.

Cons

Most work is for the sake of appearances and isn't attributable to the mission. The organisation will demand that you live by values; however, will not demonstrate them to you in return. If you gain employment after being in the RAN, it'll be because of non-technical skills you've developed (i.e. management skills, leadership etc.); however, these are not due to the Navy, they are in spite of it. The only reasonable claim that the Navy has to your skills upon leaving, is that they provided the consistently toxic environment throughout for you to hone them in. Essentially; you will know what to do because you will have experienced trauma and/or bullying and/or harassment AT A MINIMUM of once in your career (which will be ignored if complained about) and you will learn what to do by going against the institutional example you've been provided. When they are done with you, particularly for political expediency, you'll vanish.

5.0
Nov 5, 2018

CIS

Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Everyday is different, unique workplace, meet awesome people.

Cons

Work life balance is horrendous. Chance for promotion is low pending gender and recruiting targets. Easy for sub performance people to hide and slip through the cracks. Being noticeably good at your work will have you given a higher workload, often with little recognition. Focused more on image, more than results.

1.0
Aug 1, 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business Outlook

Pros

Senior Leadership actually champion (although they do err) a range of visions and values that - alone - would make people proud to serve, sacrifice, commit, and be part of something bigger. Sadly, these values and behaviours don't happen in reality. Conditions of Service (including stable pay) are generally good - although hourly pay can be criminally small once you consider the hours worked (e.g. at sea). Also expect to have to fight (either your personnel office, toll transitions, DHA, or all three as they pass the parcel) to get many of these conditions that you're entitled to. The housing purchase assistance, defence home ownership and other schemes are quite good, but don't be fooled into the belief that you'll have "free housing", you just get a (ranging from negligible to significant) subsidy towards your rent or mortgage. If you follow a traditional career path as a Maritime Warfare Officer, and attempt to get as many deployments as possible to areas like the Middle East (and don't blow it), you can put together quite a decent nest egg. The superannuation scheme (particularly for current members under MSBS or its predecessors) is unparalleled.

Cons

Because your employment is not 'employment' under Australian Law, but 'appointment' under the Defence Act, you're not entitled to minimum hourly wage, overtime, or even the right to resign (in your first 6-9 years). This is compensated by "service allowance - $10-15k", however once you divide your total salary into the hours you work, you can be paid as little as $4.50/hour to be in charge of a billion dollar warship. Real culture for junior officers (at sea and ashore) is toxic, belittling, and at complete odds to Senior Leadership intent. Expect to be treated (and referred to) as a child for at least the first ten years of your career, with no opportunities for off-model career progression, innovation or growth. Any form of innovative thinking or non-traditional posting history will halt any opportunities for promotion or advancement. Senior officers with known (and on record) history of violent, sexist and bullying behaviour are highly promoted (to O5/O6 - three to four ranks below Chief of Navy) as long as "they get the job done". Real workplace culture is a homophobic and racist "old boys" club with regular transphobic, homophobic, sexist, violent and racist comments made in open workplaces.... but expect to be forced to complete '(not so) voluntary' white ribbon programs so the RAN can maintain its accreditation. The RAN also has widespread problems with alcohol, drugs, mental health (with suicide and attempted self-harm being a daily-to-weekly occurence), and expect family breakdowns (not helped by acceptance that most married personnel will openly have a "husband or wife" at sea - aka a "sea squarie"). Zero HRM knowledge within the organisation - Career Management Agencies (misnomer) are manned by 'senior junior officers' who've "done their time at sea" and therefore 'understand strategic HR'. Expect to be regularly told that previous experience, qualifications, and expertise mean nothing now that you're in uniform. Zero interest in innovation at "the staff level" unless it can help earn your boss's boss a medal or commendation. Almost no individual medals or commendations are awarded to sailors or junior officers; instead commendations are 'rites of passage' for people who've stayed in long enough and made the right people look good. Woeful administration processes supported by no governance & policy documents and instructions that are 5-10 years old. Payroll and administration is regularly incorrect - spend a lot of your time chasing incorrect pay, administration of allowances to avoid having your wages docked because payroll screwed up once again. Deficiencies across the warfare officer branch = expect to have consolidation/post-qualified training minimised to fill gaps in other areas, and then be set up to fail. Third-world healthcare and health management (months+ waiting time, with a hostile approach to any mental healthcare, and don't expect to be able to have a check up more than once every five years). Zero transferable skills to take to the outside world - Navy has lost almost all RTO accreditation and courses that used to previously mean your training counted towards Certificates, Graduate Diplomas, or external recognised skills... google "Navy Marine Technicians lawsuit" for a classic example. IT Software is years if not decades (no exaggeration) old. Expect to spend any time at sea doing administration waiting for computers running Windows 95 and Lotus Notes to open.... one of the currently available (as at August 2018) online training courses is "What's New in Excel 2010".

Viewing 1 - 3 of 207 Reviews

Glassdoor has 214 Royal Australian Navy reviews submitted anonymously by Royal Australian Navy employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Royal Australian Navy is right for you.